
The Real Org Chart: How Decisions Actually Move
The Real Org Chart: How Decisions Actually Move
The Unfiltered Leader
No spin. No fluff. Just what actually works.
In the last issue, we looked at replacing default rules that kept you small.
Now it is time to go one level deeper.
Your best work will stall when you act on the “tidy chart” and ignore the real one. Titles show reporting lines. The real map shows how decisions truly move. Learn it and you will move work faster without losing yourself.
Here is the download...
The two charts you work in
You operate in two charts at the same time.
Formal chart
Roles, titles and reporting lines
Committees and sign offs
Accountability on paper
Real chart
Who gets asked before anything is “final”
Who shapes the recommendation off line
Who slows things by not engaging
Who carries trust, context and a quiet veto
When you ignore the second chart, three things usually happen:
You over prepare for the meeting and under prepare the conversations before it
You over focus on hierarchy and under use the connectors
Outcomes blindside you and you can feel the ground move under your feet
You are not meant to guess your way through this. You can learn to read it.
Three hidden power rules to replace
1. Old rule: The decision happens in the meeting
You prepare your slides, wait for the slot and hope the hour goes your way.
New rule: Decisions are shaped before the meeting
Treat the meeting as the last 20 percent, not the whole thing.
Share a simple pre read
Have two short touch points with key voices
Ask “Who would be surprised by this?” and adjust before the room sees it
2. Old rule: Influence follows hierarchy
You aim only at the most senior people and assume everyone else is background.
New rule: Influence follows trust and track record
Find the non-titled heavies, the fixers, the cross team connectors.
Bring them in early as partners, not as a formality. Ask what you might be missing and what would make the recommendation stronger.
3. Old rule: Avoid politics
You hope good work speaks for itself and feel uneasy talking about influence.
New rule: Work with influence without losing yourself
Map who is affected, who must be heard and who others follow.
When you use that insight to widen the conversation, you protect the people doing the work and make the decision more robust, rather than trying to game the system.
60 second power map reset
Before you launch the work, take one minute to answer:
Who really matters beyond the org chart?
Sponsor, owner, connector, quiet veto. Write down their names.
Where will this actually be shaped?
Team session, 1:1, off line working pair. Plan those moments deliberately.
What is my role in this decision?
Are you the owner, facilitator or challenger. Choose it, instead of letting everyone else choose for you.
This gets you out of “hope it lands” mode and into deliberate leadership.
One page decision packet
For high stakes calls, build a one page packet you can reuse:
Problem and target metric
Two options with real trade offs
Risk, cost and customer impact
Clear recommendation with a time window
Names consulted, next owner and due date
This gives people something concrete to react to, it stops unnecessary drift and makes the path visible.
Micro scripts you can use this week
You can drop these lines into your own language:
“Before we finalise this, who else needs to see it so they are not surprised?”
“Who do people follow on this topic and have we asked for their view?”
“If this is where the real decision happens, let us get the right people in that room.”
“Who could quietly block this and what would they need to support it?”
“Can we be clear on who is shaping this and who is deciding it?”
Let me be clear... You are not calling anyone out. You are naming how things move so people can be honest with you.
Operating process and 14 day experiment
Weekly
Spend 30 minutes updating one power map for a live decision
Book two short pre meets where the real shaping will happen
Before major calls
Send the one pager
Log objections and questions instead of letting them swirl informally
Monthly
Retire one approval that adds delay without adding quality
14 day experiment
Week 1: Map one live decision, run two pre meets, send the packet
Week 2: Hold a 20 minute decision review, close or escalate, share what moved and why
You are experimenting a new way of working, not changing everything at once.
Here is the brief
The org chart shows reporting lines. The real map moves outcomes.
See it.
Use it.
Keep your values.
You will spend fewer hours and have improved outcomes.
20 second org chart check
Answer yes or no:
I can name two non senior people who shape outcomes here
I know who is consulted before major calls
I have mapped who feels the impact of my next decision
I am present in at least some of the real decision conversations
Someone came to me early to sense check in the last two weeks
Three or more yes answers and you are working the real map.
Fewer than three and you are likely carrying more drag and risk than you need to. Start with the 60 second reset on one decision this week.
